Research & editorial standards

Show the source.
Keep the limits in view.

Our journal connects research with practical questions about children, learning and opportunity. It does not turn an interesting finding into a promise.

Four different kinds of statement.

Reported evidence describes what a study or dataset actually measured. Interpretation explains what we think it may mean. A proposal describes something Good Ground might develop. An outcome requires evidence from work that has actually taken place.

We keep these separate in articles and graphics. A diagram of a future campus is a concept, not a photograph of an operating program. A funding commitment is not a record of expenditure.

What travels with a number.

We identify its source, observation date, geography, population, measure and unit. Where available and relevant, we include uncertainty. Administrative counts, modeled estimates, survey responses and experimental outcomes are different kinds of information.

Population counts of boys ages 5–16 are not poverty counts or developmental outcomes. County averages cannot be used to classify a particular child. NAEP Proficient is not the same as state-defined grade-level performance.

Read beyond the headline.

We ask who participated, what was compared, how outcomes were measured, how long follow-up lasted and what the design can establish. Association alone does not identify a cause. A finding in one age group or setting is not automatically a finding in another.

When a study includes sex as a control variable, that does not establish an intervention effect specifically for boys. A subgroup claim requires an appropriate analysis and enough information to interpret its uncertainty.

Guidance is useful—and different from evaluation.

A research institution’s practical guide can organize good questions and activities. Its reputation is not a substitute for reviewing the evidence behind a specific intervention. We do not imply that a cited university endorses Good Ground.

History, images and corrections.

Founder recollections are attributed. Unverified quantities, named historical collaborations and media claims are withheld. Original illustrations are labeled as illustrations; conceptual program graphics are not presented as evidence of current services.

Articles carry a publication or update date. A correction should explain the changed claim and its basis. Our public inquiry route will be listed on the Contact page after verification. Private working research files and personal records are not public source links.

Public sources used at launch.

  1. Harvard Center on the Developing Child — Serve and Return
  2. Harvard Center on the Developing Child — Executive Function Activities Guide (2014)
  3. Harvard Center on the Developing Child — Building the Core Skills Youth Need for Life (2018)
  4. Early Childhood Scientific Council — From Resources to Routines (2026)
  5. U.S. Census Bureau — 2024 SAIPE North Carolina estimates
  6. U.S. Census Bureau — 2024 SAIPE U.S. and state estimates
  7. U.S. Census Bureau — 2024 SAIPE field definitions
  8. NCES — 2024 North Carolina Grade 4 Reading Snapshot
  9. NCES — Understanding NAEP Achievement Levels